reliable and unreliable information

I believe that Wikipedia.com is an unreliable source of information. This is because it is a public forum and anyone could make a claim or assertion that may be false. On the Wikipedia website, it states that you should "not use Wikipedia to make critical decisions". Wikipedia also says, "we do not expect you to trust us", this is because the information given on this website is written by editors with little diversity. many of these editors are from north America and Europe. 87 percent of these editors are also male. Wikipedia is also an unreliable website to find information because you cannot trust information you read if you do not know who wrote it.

I believe that about.com is a reliable source to find information that can be helpful. This is because this website gives you information on who wrote each piece of information. Also because each section is written by a professional who is knowledgeable about the field. About.com is written by a network of more than 750 Guides and each Guide is selectively recruited,trained, and regularly reviewed by their editorial staff. About.com Guides have deep experience and credentials in their fields .

Reflect upon

In my opinions my papers are good and when I write about a topic that I know alot about I write very well. when it comes to writing a paper talking about the meaning of something like life or going for or against a topic such as gay couples adopting, this is when i do my best. I actually thought I was an excellent writer but that was in high school. Now I have entered college and I need to expand my vocabulary in order to write better papers.I need to learn where to put commas and periods and where not to put them. I also need to be more careful when I am writing and reread my paper to see if the sentences make sense.